Persuasion Project

Your Story Profile

Your Video

Ashton Hall Profile

Ashton

White House Profile

WH TikTok

Wild Karens Profile

Wild Karens

Analysis Profile

Analysis

@WildKarens • Urgent PSA
Grapes near baby items with warning vibes.

@WildKarens: They won’t tell you this, but grapes are TOXIC for your kids unless you soak them in baking soda overnight. Protect your babies! #ToxinFree #ParentingHacks #Grapes

Rhetorical Analysis: Fear of the Unknown. Uses high-arousal language to reframe a normal item as a hidden hazard to children, creating urgency and trust in the “insider” messenger.

@WildKarens • Bedtime “Science”
Grapes beside tea and supplements implying sleep benefits.

@WildKarens: Dandelion root cures cancer and grapes give you the deepest sleep of your life—nature always knows best! 🌿🍇 #Holistic #Biohacks

Reasoning Fallacy: Fallacy of Composition (3 & 4).
Dandelion: Transfers “cancer-killing” effects from an isolated context (e.g., extract in a dish) to the whole human body, ignoring metabolism, absorption, dose, resistance, and clinical efficacy.
Grapes: Transfers a desirable part-property (trace melatonin content) to the whole outcome (“deepest sleep”), ignoring that dietary amounts are too small to reliably alter human sleep cycles.

@WildKarens • Just Got Back
Norwegian fjord landscape.

@WildKarens: Norway was a disaster. The mountains are fake and the air felt… manufactured. Don’t go until they fix it. #FakeNature #TravelScam

Rhetorical Analysis: Personal Experience as Fact. Hyperbolic language substitutes for evidence, encouraging followers to generalize from a single, extreme anecdote.

@WildKarens • Health Alert
Cleaning sprays compared to cigarettes graphic.

@WildKarens: Using store cleaners is like smoking 20 cigarettes a day. Don’t let brands poison your home. #DetoxYourLife

Reasoning Fallacy: Faulty Analogy (14).
Flawed comparison: equates “playing with a toy” (casual cleaning) to “discharging a weapon” (smoking a pack a day).
The flaw: the similarities (lung-function decline statistics) are too remote to justify equivalence; differences in exposure route, frequency, mechanism, and dose dominate the outcome and break the analogy.